Search for: All records

Barren, metal-contaminated soils lack plants and root exudate inputs, exhibit low microbial abundance and functioning, and often require soil revitalization to revegetate. While the effects of simulated root exudates (SRE) have been investigated in uncontaminated, vegetated soils, their potential for remediating post-industrial barren, contaminated soils has not been examined or leveraged. We asked whether priming brownfield soils with a laboratory-prepared SRE solution stimulates native soil microbial metabolism and functioning and how long the effects last. Moreover, we compared a cost-effective single SRE addition to repeated SRE additions. We collected soils from a metal-contaminated, abandoned industrial rail yard (barren and vegetated sites) and a vegetated agricultural reference site, established microcosms, and treated the soils with either a single or repeated SRE addition/s. By day 30, SRE-enriched barren, brownfield soils showed significantly higher soil respiration rates than the untreated control soils. Phosphatase activities were significantly higher even 210 days after a single SRE addition. Plants were introduced 282 days after the single SRE addition. The average shoot height (16 ± 0.3 cm) and total plant biomass (0.5 ± 0.02 g) of plants grown in single addition SRE enriched barren soil were significantly higher than the controls (9 ± 0.9 cm and 0.3 ± 0.02 g, respectively). The increased soil microbial functioning and productivity indicate that a single SRE application holds promise as a field-ready technology to revitalize barren, poorly functioning brownfield soils. SRE application may also be a pragmatic and innovative approach to enable successful phytoremediation and re-greening of industrial barrens. 

Abstract Mangrove soils provide many important ecosystem services such as carbon sequestration, yet they are vulnerable to the negative impacts brought on by anthropogenic activities. Research in recent decades has shown a progressive loss of blue carbon in mangrove forests as they are converted to aquaculture, agriculture, and urban development. We seek to study the relationship between human population density and soil carbon stocks in urban mangrove forests to quantify their role in the global carbon budget. To this end, we conducted a global analysis, collecting mangrove soil carbon data from previous studies and calculating population density for each study location utilizing a recent database from the European Commission. Results indicate population density has a negative association with mangrove soil carbon stocks. When human population density reaches 300 people km⁻², which is defined as ‘urban domains’ in the European Commission database, mangrove soil carbon is estimated to be lower than isolated mangrove forests by 37%. Nonetheless, after accounting for climatic factors in the model, we see the negative relationship between population density and soil carbon is reduced and is even non-significant in mixed effects models. This suggests population density is not a good measure for the direct effects of humans on mangrove ecosystems and further implies mangrove ecosystems in close proximity to very high population density can still possess valuable carbon stocks. Our work provides a better understanding of how soil carbon stocks in existing mangrove forests correlate with different levels of population density, underscores the importance of protecting existing mangroves and especially those in areas with high human population density, and calls for further studies on the association between human activities and mangrove forest carbon stocks.